>>
|
No. 88706
File
133088468703.png
- (329.65KB
, 945x945
, 1329774696299.png
)
A My Little First Fanfiction, eh? Welcome to Uma’s Writing Boot-camp, Cupcakes Knight. I’m so glad you decided, as a first time writer, to come to the Training Grounds seeking improvement - now let’s see what we can do for you!
Chapter One: The Beginning of an End >It looks like you would literally take everything you could find under a sink and smash it together. First few mistakes: One, it’s considered bad form to directly address the reader as “you,” which is what you are doing. The narration shouldn’t directly address the reader unless you have a narrator, who is a character itself, telling the story. Two, the tense is all wrong - it should be in past tense, not present tense. Three, the image this description evokes, while colorful, does not match the statue of Discord well at all. Four, using words like “literally” and “slightly” to modify actions tends to be a moot point, and generally do nothing but take away from the image. To give an example of how I would fix this sentence (grammatically): >It looked like somepony had taken everything they could find under the sink and smashed it together. Fixing it for imagery requires I change the essence of the sentence, but here’s an example: >It looked as if somepony had grabbed a dozen animals and smashed them together. This removes into the colorful sink bit, sure, but the image it evokes is much more solid and Discord-esque.
Oh goodness - reading ahead a bit, I see this is going to be fun. Now would be the time to mention that traditionally, stories are told in the past tense - while there are exceptions to this, “getting away” with present-tense and future-tense stories requires very particular formats (first person perspective, for example) and, for the most part, brilliant writing. While I can’t yet speak on the latter, not having finished reading even the first paragraph, I can only say that this story doesn’t satisfy the former. Trust me, choosing past tense will make your story much more accessible to readers, as it is the format they are used to reading. I’m aware that already, I am requesting your re-write the entirety of your fic just to change the tense, but do stick around and listen - I only want to help make your fic shine.
>It has the head of a pony with a deer antler and a goat horn, arm of an lion and all sorts of body parts from different creatures. Here is an example of how awkward present-tense writing really is. Let’s look at it after a quick change to past tense, okay? >It had the head of a pony with a deer antler and a goat horn, arm of an lion and all sorts of body parts from different creatures. Now that we’ve fixed that, let’s address the more subtle issues. One, the mis-use of “an” - you use “a” if the following word starts with a consonant sound, “an” otherwise. Let’s fix that, and make the phrase a bit more sensible: >It had the head of a pony with a deer antler and a goat horn, the arm of a lion and all sorts of body parts from different creatures. Now we’re getting there! Let’s tackle the next few issues: parallel structure and flow! Parallel structure does wonders for the flow of a sentence by cutting down on repetition and smoothing the transition between ideas. Here’s a fix: >It had the head of a pony, crowned with a deer antler and goat horn, the arm of a lion and the claw of a hawk, and all sorts of body parts from different creatures. Now that that’s done, all that is left is to minimize repetition and maximize sentence flow: >It had the arm of a lion, the claw of a hawk, the head of a pony crowned with mismatched horns, and all sorts of body parts from different creatures.
Let’s take a moment and compare the two sentences: >It has the head of a pony with a deer antler and a goat horn, arm of an lion and all sorts of body parts from different creatures. >It had the arm of a lion, the claw of a hawk, the head of a pony crowned with mismatched horns, and all sorts of body parts from different creatures. Isn’t the new version so much more readable? I think so.
You’ll notice that I chose to ultimately remove the details of what type of horns, actually. As details go, they weren’t that necessary, especially in light of my next point, which is very important.
I would say that without a doubt, most fans have a strong grasp of what Discord looks like - you do not, and should not, have to tell them Discord’s appearance unless it is drastically different from that depicted in the show. Thus, while using these descriptions of the statue to tangentially approach introducing Discord is allowable, it should probably be reserved for just that - the introduction.
There is a common mistake called Lavender Unicorn Syndrome, or LUS, the affects a large number of fics. It’s caused by choosing to refer to a pony by their physical description over their name, ie, the lavender unicorn as opposed to Twilight. The issue here is that the reader knows what Twilight looks like, so you really don’t have to keep repeating it, and it gets old really fast. If I see symptoms of LUS, I will tell you, trust me.
>To be accurate that statue represents Discord - Draconequus (or Chimera...whichever you prefer), Spirit of Disharmony and Chaos. Parenthesis have no place in a serious story, sorry - they make it sound like the narration doesn’t know what it’s talking about. Also, you always put a space after ellipses (...), for future reference.
>Few ponies know that it isn't just a statue representing Discord...it is actually Discord himself. Speaking of those ellipses... they don’t belong in narration. Use a en dash in this case (I’ll cover those shortly).
>He is imprisoned in stone so he can't hurt anyone and/or spread chaos. Same as with parenthesis, using a slash like that makes the narration sound indecisive. Pick the word you really mean and stick with it. Also: >anyone Take care, this will become a point of contention. If you chose to use anyone in your narration, stick with it. Same goes with anypony.
>Then the Mane Six trapped him inside the stone prison for a second time, and now everypony slowly forgot about the mayhem that Discord spread. But inside the stone prison he is still alive and well...bored. First of all, this is all future tense, as is everything else I’ve skipped or chosen to cover. Those will still have to all be changed to past tense. Secondly, you’ve chosen to use everypony, so go back and fix any “everyone”s you find. Third, using “but” at the beginning of a sentence. How funny that there was a hubbub about such a thing just a bit earlier in this thread. In this case, the “but” sentence does not logically oppose the preceding sentence, so you shouldn’t use “but” at all! Fourth, space after ellipsis. Fifth, no ellipsis in narration. Finally, here’s some bad news:
Telling readers what they already know is bad - it will bore them to tears almost instantly. Readers are lazy, easily discouraged, and generally stupid, and you need to anticipate this as a writer. What you’ve done above is re-tell the reader a bunch of information they already know: Discord’s statue, what it looks like, how he ended up that way. The only really novel bit is Discord being bored - and truthfully, that’s the only portion of the above I would seriously recommend keeping remotely as-is. Writing is in part an art of efficiency - as Kurt Vonnegutt said, “Start as close to the end as possible.”
The reader doesn’t really need to hear what Discord’s statue looks like, you can just cover it by saying something as simple as “Discord’s statue,” and the image comes to mind. What the reader does need to know is that Discord is still aware, and bored out of his petrified skull. How you chose to deliver that information is up to you as a writer, but keep in mind another one of Vonnegutt’s Rules: “Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted.”
>The spell that trapped him works on both levels - physical and mental. Time to learn about dashes! There are two types of literary dashes: en (–) and em (—) dashes. In the above case, you’d want to use an en dash rather than a hyphen (and always so). As to not waste your time, here’s Wikipedia’s lovely article on dash usage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dash Browse it and try and learn when to use en and em dashes, they will serve you well.
As a tl;dr, >*en (–) dash is used for pauses in a sentence, functioning like a stronger comma >*em (—) dash is used for strong breaks in thought or dialogue, to show interruption
>"Here am I once more" Discord thinks, Now we are moving into thoughts and dialogue. Thoughts should be italicized, not quoted, so the sentence should be (fixing tense as well): >Here am I once more, Discord thought, Note that there are special rules concerning the punctuation of both thoughts and dialogue. Here are some handy examples and links: >Gee, I hope I’m doing this right, he thought. >“You are,” Samantha said plainly. >Horror filled his eyes. “You can read my mind?” he said. >No, but I can read this example, Samantha thought, rolling her eyes.
What you can take from the above is a few hard-and-fast rules: >*New speaker, new paragraph, every time >*Punctuation goes inside the quotation marks in dialogue >*When the following phrase is a speech tag, the period becomes a comma >*Other than the usual rules, speech tags shouldn’t be capitalized >*The above rules hold for thoughts as well, when applicable
Dialogue: http://www.writing-world.com/fiction/dialogue.shtml
If you’re quite serious about improving as a writer, and I hope you are, then I would recommend our very own Ezn’s writing guide: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xemG7BLk2rvAmQCREIaj5wX2ubvmVt7WziEvh7xXV9g/edit . It’s full of helpful hints and quite honestly reduces this review to more of a personalized addendum/writing tutorial, but let’s continue.
Back to: >"Here am I once more" Discord thinks, "Why couldn't those meddlesome ponies let me enjoy the Chaos for little bit longer?". Given the rules I’ve laid out for you above, I’ll take a stab and fixing it. (That strange double punctuation (?".) is wrong, in case you can’t tell by the rules from earlier.) >Here am I once more, Discord thought, Why couldn’t those meddlesome ponies let me enjoy the chaos for a little bit longer? Well, now it’s mechanically correct, time to move on to the content: This doesn’t sound very much like Discord at all, let alone anyone at all. It helps to say lines like this out-loud. “Here I am once more” does sound really stiff and unnatural, doesn’t it? Try getting in-character and thinking like Discord: >So here we are again, Discord thought, stuck all by our lonesome in some stupid statue. Nice going, Discord. Now, that’s not quite what you said, but it does sound like Discord, right? Try and keep everyone in-character.
>Now I am trapped here, possibly forever, and there is nothing here except me, white, and some more white...what would I give for just a glass of chocolate milk! Contractions like “I’m” are common in spoken language, and really help to make dialogue flow (that is, if the character would use contractions to begin with). >Now I’m trapped here, possibly forever, and there is nothing here except me, white, white, me, and more white... what I would give for just a glass of chocolate milk! (I took the liberty of adding a small joke)
>And as soon as Discord thought about chocolate milk a glass of that delicious liquid appeared in front of him. Time to discuss the importance of concurrency in writing. Just binding together two actions with “and” doesn’t make them seamlessly concurrent - it helps that the phrases occur in close proximity to one another, so the the “time” between them in the mind of the reader is minimized. Given this, do you see the problem with the above phrase? Since it’s a bit clunky to just try and jam the thought and appearance together, let’s think backwards. What heralds the appearance of the glass? Sound’s a good place to start. So, let’s stitch this all together: >Now I’m trapped here, possibly forever, and there is nothing here except me, white, white, me, and more white... what I would give for just a glass of chocolate milk! Anything but this plain, boring, stupi— >Discord froze mid-thought, the faint tinkle of glass echoing through the nothingness. He turned his head slowly, watching the glass of chocolate milk with interest.
See how the sound of the glass appearing is easier to link to Discord’s thoughts than the description of the glass? Anyways, the is just an example. Feel free to take your own liberties and experiment with style and phrasing.
>"Interesting...I couldn't do that last time...I wonder..." and then for about 2 hours Discord thought about all kinds of things, stars, balloons and even silly things like a cat-a-pult. 1) Spaces after ellipsis 2) Thoughts in italics 3) Missing a thought tag 4) Catapult 5) Telling vs. Showing
I’ve covered all the others, so time for Telling vs. Showing: Telling is when the narrator simply describes something as opposed to displaying to for the reader - if you’re confused as to when you’re telling, a good rule of thumb is to remember that telling is the easier of the two. In the above quote, you’ve managed to reduce two hours of spontaneous chaos into a single, meager, boring sentence. Telling is concise and dry, showing is deep and colorful. The key to writing a good story is to know when to tell, and to always show more than tell. Show me that scene! I want to know how Discord reacted to his new-found power, the progression of events. Don’t you just time-skip that.
Okay, so I think I've covered all of your most common errors now, so what comes next is purely up to you. I do hope you can learn from the above and apply it to the rest of your fic - there’s a lot to fix, but the idea’s worth saving! Just take your time and proof read it carefully, and you’ll get the hang of things. Feel free to return when you’ve done so, you’ll be sure to get another review and improve even more! One little bit extra:
>do we really have to know the reason for everything? Look, just don’t bring it up if you aren’t going to explain it, please. It might be fun to jerk your readers around, but this is just silly - besides, the fact that this is all in his head anyways gives us an acceptable answer.
|