|
>>
|
No. 165110
ID: 40a1fc
File
142253868390.jpg
- (173.08KB
, 768x927
, MLPchan and GETchan circle efchan while ponychan observes placidly from a distance.jpg
)
>>165090
See >>165099
Yeah people might hate me / the mods for not following their idea, but it doesn't mean the idea was discarded.
More data is always good, especially since some people are fucking twats in that they dont say anything unless prompted.
Pleasing everybody is impossible, but getting the majority to contain their mammary calamity over an issue is still valuable.
---------
Anyway, the consensus seems to be that people are mostly alright with the merger, except for hiccups about rule enforcement.
>Too draconian
>Not draconian enough.
Reposting from /site/
The specific problem we're having right now though is that the image is ambiguous about
>Depictions of sex acts
Which is why i also included the second image, i could have also cut the image in half at the waist to accomplish the same thing.
As changeing the listed rules in the OP all of a sudden would be a bad idea, i'm going to ask for opinions.
Might not actually do what you want, but every opinion would be considered.
In the interest of clarity, would you prefer the global rules listed in the OP:
No pornography or overtly sexual images outside of /anon/
No gore or images of extreme violence outside of /anon/
be changed to:
Depictions of sex acts, genitals, female nipples, sex fluids are prohibited outside of /anon/
Depictions of explicit dismemberment, torture, or butchery are prohibited outside of /anon/
respectively.
Because even with the "clarified" rules, i would still delete the aforementioned image because of the the location of the dudes hands over her crotch causing ambiguity.
I know i make mistakes, i know everyone makes mistakes, but in ambiguous situations like this, i consider it better for a mod to err on the side of caution and be considered fun police.
Because the alternative is doing nothing and potentially causing a consistency problem when a similar image is posted that is less ambiguous but still arguably within the rules.
What it boils down to is essentially "Where do we draw the line." because on one side, too much is allowed and a person is allowed to break the rules while on the other side, not enough is allowed and people get punished for something undeserved.
Personally, i'm okay with being considered hitler-satan if the rules were enforced as consistently as possible.
I've given a suggestion to mergechat that might solve the problem, but i wont mention it here yet because i dont want to suggest something no other mod would get behind only reason i'm mentioning it at all is so it doesnt seem like i've just pulled it out of my ass at the last minute in response to something.
|